>>> Posting number 8383, dated 16 Jun 2004 13:22:02
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:22:02 -0400
Reply-To: Discussion of Fraud in Science <SCIFRAUD@LISTSERV.ALBANY.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of Fraud in Science <SCIFRAUD@LISTSERV.ALBANY.EDU>
From: Peter Hinkle <pch5@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: BMC Journals
In-Reply-To: <005601c453c3$e5e7ac30$0700000a@zipi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The J. Biol. Chem. has one of the highest citation rates and one of the
most thorough review policies. Every paper has the following
footnote: The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in
part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be
hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. They do not need the
money. Some years ago they voted to keep the page charges to try to
keep down the number of papers submitted (as it is they publish over
30,000 pages per year). The problem with journals is not the page
charges but the commercial journals, such as Elsevier, that are ripping
off libraries with excessive charges and requirements that if an
essential journal is subscribed to then 10 others that are not wanted
must be as well. The payment to elsevier for electronic access is
millions of dollars per year per university. To some it is already
considered unethical to publish in such journals (including Science and
Nature). Why should they be allowed to make an excessive profit
from, and restrict access to, publicly funded research?
Peter
At 01:03 PM 6/16/2004, you wrote:
I've noticed that the BMC charges $525 for publishing an accepted paper (this information appears in the instructions to authors)
I would be highly suspicious of the validity of any journal that accepts a fee for publishing
Tzippy Shochat