| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-07-06) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2006-07-16) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-07-16) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-07-19) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster) (2006-07-19) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? pocmatos@gmail.com (Paulo Matos) (2006-07-31) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2006-07-31) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-08-03) |
| Re: Parser performance, was What is the future of Compiler technology? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-03) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2006-08-04) |
| Re: Parser performance, was What is the future of Compiler technology? gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2006-08-04) |
| Re: Parser performance, was What is the future of Compiler technology? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-05) |
| Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-05) |
| [6 later articles] |
| From: | Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 31 Jul 2006 23:34:09 -0400 |
| Organization: | Integrable Solutions |
| References: | 06-06-044 06-06-055 06-07-023 06-07-031 06-07-109 |
| Keywords: | parse, performance |
| Posted-Date: | 31 Jul 2006 23:34:09 EDT |
"Paulo Matos" <pocmatos@gmail.com> writes:
| [I don't think I've ever seen an application where the parser took
| enough time to worry about. Lexer performance is much more important
| since the lexer is the only part of the compiler that has to look at
| each character of the input program. -John]
From experience, the performance of the GCC/g++ *parser* had worried
and continue to worry users and corporate that base their system
compilers on it.
--
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
[Really? The parser, not the lexer? -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.