| Related articles |
|---|
| Scheduling without profiling linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2009-02-19) |
| Re: Scheduling without profiling blume@hana.uchicago.edu (Matthias Blume) (2009-02-19) |
| Re: Scheduling without profiling SidTouati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2009-02-20) |
| Re: Scheduling without profiling linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2009-03-06) |
| Re: Scheduling without profiling SidTouati@inria.fr (touati) (2009-03-10) |
| From: | Matthias Blume <blume@hana.uchicago.edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:04:24 -0600 |
| Organization: | The University of Chicago |
| References: | 09-02-098 |
| Keywords: | code, optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 19 Feb 2009 18:13:20 EST |
Stephan Ceram <linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net> writes:
> Does it make sense to implement global (or regional) instruction
> scheduling (within a compiler) when profiling information is not
> available? ...
You can calculate estimated execution frequencies based on static
branch prediction. There is a lot of excellent literature on this
topic .
Matthias
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.