Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues

lawrence.jones@siemens.com
Wed, 19 May 2010 11:51:11 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues stargazer3p14@gmail.com (Stargazer) (2010-05-10)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues marc@lithia.nl (Marc van Lieshout) (2010-05-16)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues esosman@ieee.org (Eric Sosman) (2010-05-17)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-17)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-19)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues bartc@freeuk.com (bart.c) (2010-05-19)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues lawrence.jones@siemens.com (2010-05-19)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-19)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2010-05-20)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues s_dubrovich@yahoo.com (2010-05-22)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues lawrence.jones@siemens.com (2010-05-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: lawrence.jones@siemens.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:51:11 -0400
Organization: Siemens PLM Software
References: 10-05-036 10-05-095 10-05-103
Keywords: C
Posted-Date: 19 May 2010 22:24:49 EDT

Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>
> So in (x + 5), x *isn't* an lvalue, even though it started out as one.


I disagree -- x *is* an lvalue, but it's converted to the value stored in
the object when the containing expression is evaluated.
--
Larry Jones

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.