Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target?

Jeremy Wright <jeremy.wright@microfocus.com>
Thu, 24 May 2012 08:30:51 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? arcfide@sacrideo.us (Aaron W. Hsu) (2012-05-22)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? arcfide@sacrideo.us (Aaron W. Hsu) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2012-05-25)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-05-29)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Jeremy Wright <jeremy.wright@microfocus.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 08:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 12-05-015
Keywords: Java, Cobol
Posted-Date: 25 May 2012 00:59:05 EDT

Micro Focus has a COBOL compiler that compiles direct to JVM byte code.


Last year's The Server Side Java Symposium had a panel discussion "Who Invited
All These Other Languages to My JVM?" but I can't find a write up anywhere.


To answer the specific question, the lack of "unsigned" can be inconvenient.


Jeremy

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.