Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Best language for implementing compilers? costello@mitre.org (Costello, Roger L.) (2019-02-08) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? nalaginrut@gmail.com (Nala Ginrut) (2019-02-09) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2019-02-08) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? robin51@dodo.com.au (Robin Vowels) (2019-02-09) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? bc@freeuk.com (Bart) (2019-02-11) |
| Best language for implementing compilers? davidlovemore@gmail.com (David Lovemore) (2019-02-12) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (2019-02-12) |
| Re: Best language for implementing compilers? 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2019-02-12) |
| [22 later articles] |
| From: | Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Feb 2019 00:27:48 +0800 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 19-02-002 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="4553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | ML, books |
| Posted-Date: | 08 Feb 2019 11:38:16 EST |
The book you are referring to is "the Tiger book" which has 3 version:
Java, C and ML.
I have C version and I love it. However ML has many features to save
your time on implementing data structures.
In addition, the modern Scheme which contains pattern matching and
record-type is as good as ML in my opinion.
Best regards.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.