| Related articles |
|---|
| From: | Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:50:07 +0000 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 22-01-059 22-01-083 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="60870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | C++, parse, question |
| Posted-Date: | 22 Jan 2022 11:01:12 EST |
| Content-Language: | en-US |
Kaz Kylheku wrote this about the C++ compiler:
> In other words, a major compiler for probably
> the programming language with the most
> complicated syntax ever, eschews pretty much
> all that we have learned and accumulated about
> parsing between around 1968 and now.
Yikes!
They ignored the rich theory and vast set of algorithms, in favor of their own
proprietary code? Why would the C++ compiler developers do such a thing?
/Roger
[My guess is that they were too busy chopping down trees to sharpen their axes. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.