Re: Programming language similarity

Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk>
Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:50:23 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Programming language similarity pronesto@gmail.com (Fernando) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com (Jan Ziak) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity meshach.mitchell@gmail.com (Meshach Mitchell) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk (Derek Jones) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk (Derek Jones) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2022-04-25)
Re: Programming language similarity derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk (Derek Jones) (2022-04-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:50:23 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 22-04-012 22-04-016 22-04-019 22-04-020
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="98154"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: history
Posted-Date: 25 Apr 2022 22:40:48 EDT
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: 22-04-020

gah4,


> In any case, character set limitations stay with us long after
> the reason for the limitation has gone.


More than you probably wanted to know about character set
history still being with us
https://archive.org/details/mackenzie-coded-char-sets


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.