Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers?

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Mon, 30 Oct 2023 04:26:10 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Which comes first, languages or compilers? gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2023-10-25)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? 864-117-4973@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2023-10-26)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? minforth@arcor.de (minf...@arcor.de) (2023-10-27)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? laguest@archeia.com (Luke A. Guest) (2023-10-27)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2023-10-30)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? OrangeFish9737@invalid.invalid (OrangeFish9737) (2023-10-30)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? laguest@archeia.com (Luke A. Guest) (2023-10-30)
Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? tkoenig@netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig) (2023-11-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 04:26:10 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 23-10-008 23-10-011
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="20811"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: design, history
Posted-Date: 30 Oct 2023 06:42:30 EDT
In-Reply-To: 23-10-011

On 10/27/23 5:57 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:


> I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
> they would not have the gaping big holes they have.


The *languages* are all well designed, system *libraries* are incomplete
or missing.


DoDi

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.