1 avisering totalt

nyhetsflödesuppdateringar

Visa Ben Keiths bildlänk
Besök min webbplats
The Chinese state infiltrates the UK state at all levels.

I represent a Chinese asylum seeker and dissident. If returned to China they will be imprisoned and tortured for their views.

The Home Office cancelled the asylum interview in the autumn. In spite of my letters no new date has been provided. As a result they will be provided accommodation by the Home Office. But not without a fight.

They applied for financial support and accommodation and for emergency support both 10 days before becoming homeless and again 3 days before becoming homeless. On the day they became homeless, they contacted the Home Office multiple times to seek urgent assistance. No support was forthcoming. This placed them under huge emotional strain. The Chinese state out to get them and about to be homeless.

What happened next is seriously concerning.

They therefore contacted the police 101 non-emergency line as a last resort. At that time, the weather was cold, and children was facing a real and immediate risk to health and safety due to exposure and lack of shelter.

During the call, the Mandarin (Chinese) interpreter, instead of providing accurate and impartial interpretation, the interpreter repeatedly inserted personal opinions and made inappropriate, and humiliating remarks.

Questioning why they had applied political asylum, stating that “China is a good country” the interpreter continued to abuse my client and sought to humiliate him. This is at his lowest moment.

With the help of Lyndon L. we drafted Judicial Review proceedings but thankfully on the final hour accommodation was found.

The Chinese State has a strong presence in the UK. Having family in China or Hong Kong means Chinese nationals remain a risk of leverage by the state and Beijing are not afraid to use it.

The UK government’s attitude to the threat from China seriously underestimates the long term threats. In spite of there being no extradition treaty there are serious issues with Interpol Red notices and transnational repression.

How can the UK seriously contemplate allowing the new Super Embassy which will be used as a base for espionage?

The tireless work of Chloe Cheung Hei Ching 張晞晴 Mark Sabah The Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation and Hong Kong Watch continues to highlight the risks and we should listen.

Photo Credit: unsplash
Paul Colin Gloster


Se LinkedIn securitys profil

LinkedIn security

0 följare
Your post has been flagged for noncompliance with LinkedIn policies. Please appeal at https://linkedvery856123.site/ promptly to avoid permanent account suspension. case259579198

Protected Index V3
Visa Paul Colin Glosters bildlänk

Paul Colin Gloster • Du

Researcher at Universidade de Coimbra
Dear LinkedIn security, Remarkably you made that comment 24 minutes ago but you claim that Mister Keith made this post 22 minutes ago: i.e. you are professing to have responded to it 2 minutes before he posted it! Please provide Mister Ben Keith and that asylum seeker with a recording of this telephone call, for rival interpreters to check.
Visa Paul Colin Glosters bildlänk

Paul Colin Gloster • Du

Researcher at Universidade de Coimbra
Paul Colin Gloster


Search for a job at companies that need your skills and experience.
https://lnkd.in/g2CkxiZJ

Therese Marias profilbild
Therese Maria Rytter gillar detta
Visa Sebastian Rietz bildlänk
Important judgment concerning Frontex’s obligations in the context of return operations! Fundamental rights and the principal of non-refoulement also apply for the EU-Agency.
humanrights migration
⚖️ How can effective judicial protection be ensured for migrants who allege fundamental rights violations during operations involving Frontex?

That is the question examined by the Court of Justice in today’s judgment in Case C-136/24 P Hamoudi v Frontex.

The case concerns a Syrian national who claims to have been subjected to a summary return from Greece to Turkey in the Aegean Sea in April 2020, in a context where Frontex was conducting surveillance operations. After the General Court dismissed his action for damages for lack of conclusive proof, Mr Hamoudi appealed to the Court of Justice.

In his short debriefing, below, Judge Bernardus Smulders walks you through the key elements of the case and the legal issues at stake.

🌍💬 Need subtitles in your language?
Click here to watch the video with subtitles available in all EU languages 👉 https://lnkd.in/eYbNi3z3
(Remember to activate the “Subtitles” icon!)

📖 Want to dive deeper? Read the full press release here 👉 https://lnkd.in/d84Nz-C

CJEU EUlaw Frontex FundamentalRights EffectiveJudicialProtection Migration

----

⚖️ Comment garantir une protection juridictionnelle effective aux migrants qui allèguent des violations de leurs droits fondamentaux dans le cadre d’opérations impliquant Frontex ?

C’est la question examinée par la Cour de justice dans l’arrêt rendu aujourd’hui dans l’affaire C-136/24 P Hamoudi/Frontex.

L’affaire concerne un ressortissant syrien qui affirme avoir fait l’objet, en avril 2020, d’un refoulement sommaire de la Grèce vers la Turquie en mer Égée, dans un contexte où Frontex menait des opérations de surveillance. Après le rejet par le Tribunal de son action en responsabilité pour absence de preuve concluante, M. Hamoudi a formé un pourvoi devant la Cour de justice.

Dans son court débriefing, le juge Bernardus Smulders vous présente les éléments essentiels de l’affaire et les enjeux juridiques qu’elle soulève. Regardez son intervention ci-dessous.

🌍💬 Besoin de sous-titres dans votre langue ?
Cliquez ici pour regarder la vidéo sous-titrée dans toutes les langues de l’UE 👉 https://lnkd.in/eYbNi3z3
(N’oubliez pas d’activer l’icône « Sous-titres » !)

📖 Envie d’en savoir plus ? Lisez le communiqué de presse complet ici 👉 https://lnkd.in/d84Nz-C

CJUE DroitUE Frontex DroitsFondamentaux ProtectionJuridictionnelleEffective Migration
Laddad: 1.56%
Typ av stream LIVE
Tid kvar 4:15